AECTURA Data Dictionary turns consultant submissions into one governed record of infrastructure asset data. Every submission passes a two-stage engineering review built on ISO and industry standards.
Accounts are set up by your program administrator.
Each asset class follows the same path. A structured submission goes through two stages of review before it joins the master record.
Consultants upload a data dictionary workbook with sample datasheets for each object. The platform reads real files as they arrive and turns formatting issues into reviewable feedback instead of rejections.
An automated engine runs dozens of structure and integrity checks. Reviewers then work through each finding, record their marks with evidence, and agree an outcome for the submission.
A curator promotes accepted content into the Master Data Dictionary. From that point it is the governed reference for every team and system downstream.
Everyone works from the same review, with the evidence on screen. Nothing moves forward until the people responsible agree it should.
Submit dictionaries and follow feedback through each round to acceptance.
Mark every check with evidence and finalize each stage together.
Approve what enters the master record and publish it downstream.
The master record is not locked inside the platform. It publishes to familiar spreadsheets and open industry formats, so engineers, software, and design tools all read the same definitions.
Workbooks and per-object datasheets in Excel, ready for engineering teams to use without new software.
A machine-readable catalog for the buildingSMART Data Dictionary, which links definitions across construction software.
Property sets in the IFC open standard, so definitions carry into design models and asset management systems.
Sign in to your workspace, or request access through your program administrator.